A street-interview about a single dating-app label that accidentally maps the gap between how gay men perform identity online and what they actually want in bed.
The top comment — 81 likes, calling it 'the hard hitting journalism we need in 2026' — landed on a video where 44% of the comment section is still actively arguing the definition, a ratio that signals a genuine community fault line, not just entertainment.
The hosts are themselves participants in the confusion: Andrew's mid-video realization at 9:05 that 'vers' means WANT not CAN turns the format from reportage into live discovery, giving the video its spine.
Watch outThe running joke that 'vers = bottom' risks collapsing into a punchline — several commenters with genuine versatile experience pushed back, and the video never fully distinguishes mood-based flexibility from profile-based deception.
If the can/want distinction is the real fault line, the question isn't whether vers is a scam — it's whether any fixed profile label can describe a preference that shifts by mood, partner, and context.
Andrew and Don take to the streets of Nichome — Tokyo's gay quarter — to ask community members how they interpret the word 'vers' (versatile) on gay dating profiles. Through a series of candid street interviews and an extended on-camera discussion between the two hosts, the video surfaces a core tension: whether 'vers' signals that someone CAN perform both roles or that they WANT to perform both, and how that ambiguity leads to mismatched expectations. The video does not reach a definitive answer but frames clearer communication as the practical takeaway.
Andrew and Don canvass Nichome, Tokyo's gay district, asking men what 'vers' actually means on dating profiles — and find no consensus. Interviewees split between the 'can do both' reading and the 'want to do both, anytime' reading, with most concluding that vers-bottom and vers-top are usually just bottoms hedging their bets. The hosts end up workshopping their own identities on camera, with Andrew realizing mid-interview that his interpretation of the label had been wrong for years.
How this video's like-and-comment rate compares to this channel's running average.
Opening 15 seconds — the bit that decides whether a viewer keeps watching.
“[0:00] I kind of wanna ask the community what their thoughts are regarding the word, 'vers' [0:06] I think a lot of people become vers as they get older [0:12] On Grindr. I label myself as a side [0:14] You are absolutely not a side!
The teaser structure works — 'You are absolutely not a side!' injects immediate social conflict — but the framing line 'I kind of wanna ask the community' is passive meta-commentary that dilutes the opening. Compared to TokyoBTM's stronger in-media-res openers, this one announces the premise instead of dropping viewers into the controversy.
Three alternative openings, each in a different archetype. Each is under 40 words — completable in 15 seconds.
“I asked 8 gay men in Tokyo's gayborhood what 'vers' actually means on a dating profile — almost none of them agreed.”
WhyThe disagreement count anchors a specific finding before a single interview plays, making the video feel like a report with stakes rather than a casual chat.
“Every 'vers' profile on Grindr is actually a bottom. Tokyo's gay community just told us why.”
WhyMirrors the video's dominant conclusion — confirmed by both interviewees and top comments — while making the claim provocative enough to generate disagreement-clicks from actual vers viewers.
“— 'I label myself as a side.' — 'You are absolutely NOT a side.' We went to Nichome to settle this.”
WhyLifts the video's single best comedic moment into the first five words, establishes both hosts' chemistry, and lets the conflict speak without any explanation.
The title delivers on its promise — the video is genuinely a definitional investigation — but the most memorable finding (can vs. want, and the widespread suspicion that 'vers' is a bottom strategy) is nowhere in the title. Comments reveal that the can/want distinction landed as a real revelation for many viewers, which would have been a much stronger hook phrase than the generic question format.
Show Don and Andrew on the Nichome street in their colour-coded coats with a bold text overlay — 'VERS = BOTTOM?' or a split 'CAN / WANT' label — since the terminology debate and host chemistry are what comment evidence shows actually drove engagement.
123 comments analysed and clustered into themes.
The 'hard hitting journalism we need in 2026' framing (81 likes) crystallized the audience's affection for treating a taboo topic with deadpan seriousness. Don's blunt delivery — particularly 'I know too many bottoms who say they are vers' — drew repeated praise, with one commenter writing 'he always brings in an interesting perspective' and lobbying for him to be made a permanent third host. The 'can vs want' distinction Andrew arrived at around 9:05 resonated so strongly that multiple commenters independently restated it in their own words without prompting.
How the audience feels — a Net Sentiment mood score, how split the room is, and an early churn signal. All from the comments, not YouTube analytics.
Net Sentiment Score over 78 analysed comments; headline adjusted toward the channel norm (Bayesian, C=20). Polarization = normalised entropy. Comment-derived — not YouTube analytics.
Who actually showed up in the comments — psychographic, topical and language mix. Computed deterministically from 78 labeled root comments.
YouTube’s 2025 discovery shift now weights satisfaction signals — comment sentiment, tone, and depth. We can’t see the model, but we can estimate its inputs. Directional only.
Key transcript moments — tap a timestamp to jump to that point in the video.
Each comment theme mapped to the transcript moment that sparked it.
The 'Tokyo Tops / Tokyo Holes' cold open and traffic-light outfit banter set the comedic register that the top comment ('hard hitting journalism') celebrated; Don's blunt claim at 1:49 that he knows too many fake-vers bottoms drew the strongest appreciation of his presence
The 'can vs want' realization Andrew articulates at 9:05–9:15 was the intellectual peak of the video — multiple commenters independently echoed the exact distinction in their own words; the 'vers bottom is bait' framing at 4:49 generated the strongest agreement-and-pushback cluster in the comment section
Severity × frequency — ranked. Each point has an evidence quote and a concrete before/after suggestion.
“Noticed how Meng is not in this video after he switched to "verse" last year 👀”↗ view
“"Total tops" or "total bottoms"'are tiresome and performative🤷🏾♂️. I am verse. Y'all pick the WORST takes of this topic.”↗ view
“Wow! is it really so complicated Japan? I'm here in Germany and mostly it is made clear what's happening before we meet.”↗ view
“i had to look it up, because genuinely i had never heard the term before this video.”↗ view
“I used to live in Canada and I thought being bottom doesn't mean they don't want their D to be taken care of… for me what he is describing (in 'America' presumably US) is just a selfish/"lazy" top...😂”↗ view
“Thanks for suffering in the cold for us viewers🤗😘”↗ view
“So what does a "vers side" mean then?”
“Are hookups in Japan (Tokyo) happening without clarity on the hookup itself? Are people purposefully leaving out details of a hookup to better secure the date?”↗ view
“When are you guys gonna review the Boyfriend Season 2?”↗ view
“Could you do a Video like this, where you ask, if Japanese gays would date foreigners?”↗ view
What a brand or agency would see evaluating this video — which sponsors to pitch, why, what to charge, and what's safe.
Audience shows strong app-platform engagement — multiple commenters volunteer the specific apps they use (Grindr, 9 Monsters) and debate profile-tagging strategy, which is unusually high product-context signal for a chat video. Ad tolerance reads moderate-to-high: zero comments complain about commercial framing, and the format already names a third-party app organically on-camera. Purchase-referral behavior is implicit rather than explicit (no 'where can I buy X' asks), so this is a trust-and-relevance audience, not a click-and-convert one.
Mid-roll dedicated 60-90s read at the 4:57 'become more vers as they get older' beat — that's where audience attention spikes and the product context (dating-app UX) is already loaded; pre-roll wastes the strongest contextual hook.
“Maybe the solution is for people to be able to rank their preferences of what they would enjoy on their profile rather than fitting into rigid roles.”— Direct product-feature request — pitchable hook for any dating-app sponsor with richer tagging.↗ view
“I'm on Grindr and 9 Monsters”— Audience self-identifies as multi-app user — cross-app sponsors viable.
“I think people turn into bottom after turning 30 its because they tired”— Wellness/ED DTC ICP signal — aging-out-of-hookup-energy theme.↗ view
Algorithm Signal is a proxy. YouTube’s satisfaction scores aren’t public. Directional, not predictive.
Unanswered questions and explicit requests from the comment thread — fuel for the next upload.
Three video ideas pulled directly from what the comments asked for.
Street interviews in Nichome asking Japanese gay men whether they would date foreigners and what nationalities/types they prefer
Boyfriend Season 2 watch-along or reaction episode with Don
The top shortage — why are there so few real tops and so many bottoms in gay communities worldwide
Round-table with Don and returning interviewees to resolve the long-term compatibility question: can two vers people actually work
The 'side' identity explained — extended interviews with gay men who identify as sides and what their dating life actually looks like
Gay dating app experiment — create identical profiles with different labels (vers, vers bottom, bottom, side) and report what each actually attracts
Concrete, testable changes for the next upload. Each cites a timestamp, a comment quote, or a metric — and names what to watch.
Bring Meng back next episode — explicit absence noted with concern.
Make the 'CAN vs WANT' framing the title/hook of a follow-up — it's the moment the audience consistently quotes.
Run a poll/community-post asking 'should profiles let you rank preferences?'
Cut a Short from 15:43-16:02 with text overlay 'CAN vs WANT'.
Do a 'gay dating outside Japan' comparison episode — multiple international commenters volunteer their context.
Reply-thread the top 5 long-form comments (especially #31 USCanthony and #62 willujames) in-app.
Greenlight the 'Boyfriend Season 2 review' episode.
Address the 'sides' confusion in a dedicated explainer — there's clear unmet demand.
Show the on-screen Japanese app UI (9 Monsters profile fields) while interviewing — currently a missed visual.
Lean into Don as recurring on-camera correspondent rather than guest.
A/B test thumbnail with the literal text 'Is vers a scam?' (commenter-coined phrasing).
Add a pinned comment with a glossary of terms (top/bottom/vers/side/vers-top/vers-bottom).
Pitch Grindr or 9 Monsters for a sponsored explainer or co-branded survey episode.
Run a viewer survey ('what does vers mean to you?') and dedicate the next episode to results.
Stop shooting in audible cold — it visibly degrades performance.
Use timestamped chapters — none currently exist and the video has clear segment breaks.
Reach out to commenter #20 (B.WeirdGaming 'I'd love to edit for you guys') — recurring 'where is the editor' comments suggest production bandwidth gap.
Open every episode with a one-line viewer-question call-to-action ('What does X mean where YOU live?').
Create a short follow-up addressing the 'becoming vers/bottom after 30' theme.
Reply to commenter #5 月風-m4h (Taiwan mountains) publicly — earned 13 likes as a 'wholesome outsider' moment.
Who to reply to first — ranked by impact, with a ready-to-send draft in your voice.
When are you guys gonna review the Boyfriend Season 2?
It's on the list! Season 2 gave us a lot to talk about. Stay tuned.
It's different for everyone. Some can top/bottom and prepare as such every time they go out. Some have days when they only wanna top and days when they only wanna bottom - still counts as vers. Some would only top/bottom depending on the other person e.g. would only top twinks or would only bottom if you're hot enough or a vers top who would only bottom for pure tops. In my case: I'm vers top and my bf is vers bottom. When we're together, the DEFAULT expectation is that I'll top and he'll bottom - we don't need to talk about it. I don't "prepare"... unless bf tells me in advance that he wants to top this weekend.
The default expectation point is something we completely missed in the video — that's exactly the relationship side of this we didn't get to. Would love to do a follow-up on long-term vers dynamics.
Maybe the solution is for people to be able to rank their preferences of what they would enjoy on their profile rather than fitting into rigid roles.
A preference slider instead of a fixed label — that's actually such a smart fix. Someone needs to pitch this to Grindr.
Noticed how Meng is not in this video after he switched to "verse" last year 👀
He was busy preparing 😂
Hey y'all! Great video 😊 glad I could be a little part of it. ❤
You were genuinely great — the moment where you realized what vers actually means was one of the best in the whole thing. Thanks for being so open.
i'd like to thank you for introducing me to the term "side" because i was beginning to think i was going insane over my place in the whole top/bottom dichotomy. (granted, i had to look it up, because genuinely i had never heard the term before this video.)
This is exactly why we do these videos. You're definitely not alone in that — glad it clicked.
Yay I love Don! In my head he's secretly the 3rd crew member. He always brings in a interesting perspective
Don has been officially promoted to honorary 3rd crew member effective immediately. We'll let him know 😂
Hey, you always do Interviews like: Dating in Japan as a foreigner, from ur perspective. Could you do a Video like this, where you ask, if Japanese gays would date foreigners? Would be so interesting. And like.. which guys they prefer.
We've actually talked about this one — the answers might genuinely surprise you. Adding it to the list.
Heres the translation,, Vers = Bottom, Bottom = Bottom, Vers top= Bottom, Vers Bottom = Bottom and Top= Top. Dont be trusting these Vers people lol. Are we getting the picture yet?
This is somehow the most efficient summary of the entire 25 minutes 😂 You should've been our editor.
I don't use dating apps because I live in the mountains of Taiwan (where there are only wild boars and monkeys 🤣so i'm Allway alone～a single🤣～I think I'm not Top, not button, not vers 😅the side)
Wild boars and monkeys — honestly a more honest dating pool than Grindr 😂 Sending love from Tokyo.
Great to see you out and about, Andrew! Love the hat the cold made me think of your trip to Sapporo. I love when you guys hit the streets. It was an interesting episode and I enjoyed the interviews. The guy in the blue coat was handsome 🙂
Thank you! The cold was very real that day 😅 The blue coat guy was a good sport — glad you enjoyed it.
I think what Don said about the 'anytime' part is the crux of this issue. It becomes quite performative in a sense.
Performative is exactly the right word for it. Don would appreciate that framing.
Shareable social-proof quotes — ready for thumbnails, community posts, or a sponsor deck.
“This is the hard hitting journalism we need in 2026 😂”
“Heres the translation,, Vers = Bottom, Bottom = Bottom, Vers top= Bottom, Vers Bottom = Bottom and Top= Top. Dont be trusting these Vers people lol. Are we getting the picture yet?”
“Yay I love Don! In my head he's secretly the 3rd crew member. He always brings in a interesting perspective”
“Vers is like that international travel adapter plug in your travel luggage. It gets plugged in multi versally and it can be plug into any world electric socket”
“Dude, y'all have moxie and gumption galore! 😄 I love it. 9 monsters... Japan is epic.”
“We love a bit of surveys and research ❤”
“I love these Street interviews 😁”
“there's no gay sex like the gay sex that two versatile dudes can have. If you've only been playing one position, consider expanding your horizons.”
Moments worth cutting into Shorts — each with a title and a ready hook line. Timestamps link to the video.
Verbatim — the 5 most representative comments from the thread.
This is the hard hitting journalism we need in 2026 😂
When are you guys gonna review the Boyfriend Season 2?
It's different for everyone. Some can top/bottom and prepare as such every time they go out. Some have days when they only wanna top and days when they only wanna bottom - still counts as vers. Some would only top/bottom depending on the other person e.g. would only top twinks or would only bottom if you're hot enough or a vers top who would only bottom for pure tops. In my case: I'm vers top and my bf is vers bottom. When we're together, the DEFAULT expectation is that I'll top and he'll bottom - we don't need to talk about it. I don't "prepare"... unless bf tells me in advance that he wants to top this weekend.
Maybe the solution is for people to be able to rank their preferences of what they would enjoy on their profile rather than fitting into rigid roles.
I don't use dating apps because I live in the mountains of Taiwan (where there are only wild boars and monkeys 🤣so i'm Allway alone～a single🤣～I think I'm not Top, not button, not vers 😅the side)
Top reply-magnet comments — where the real debate happened. 45 replies across 28 roots · max chain 3 deep · creator replied to 8%
This is the hard hitting journalism we need in 2026 😂
When are you guys gonna review the Boyfriend Season 2?
so the profiles should ask u for what u'r in the mood for each time u are on it
It's different for everyone. Some can top/bottom and prepare as such every time they go out. Some have days when they only wanna top and days when they only wanna bottom - still counts as vers. Some would only top/bottom depending on the other person e.g. would only top twinks…
I think what Don said about the 'anytime' part is the crux of this issue. It becomes quite performative in a sense.
Other featured deep dives on this channel.
