A breezy Tokyo flatmates-venting session that accidentally became the channel's most medically significant video, turning on a single off-hand endorsement of STI non-disclosure.
The three most-liked comments — 120, 108, and 66 likes respectively — all address the STI take exclusively, despite it appearing only in the final quarter of a video nominally about blocking.
The washitsu confessional format and friend-chat register lowered the audience's defences: Meng's 'don't ask, don't tell' line landed as sincere belief, not provocation, which is why the pushback was so direct.
Watch outMeng's acknowledgement that syphilis rates in Japan are high inadvertently confirms the audience's concern without retracting the advice — the medically contested framing stays live in the video as uploaded.
If the channel makes the promised follow-up STI video, it will have to choose between defending cultural relativism and aligning with public health consensus — and both paths carry audience cost.
Andrew and Meng, two gay content creators based in Japan, sit down in a tatami room to discuss the experience of being blocked on dating apps like Grindr and Tinder. They share personal anecdotes and stories from friends to illustrate how common and emotionally confusing blocking has become. The conversation broadens from a Japan-specific frustration to a universal dating-culture problem. Near the end, the discussion turns to a story involving an STI disclosure request that led to a block, prompting a debate between the two hosts about norms around informing sexual partners.
Andrew and Meng film in a tatami Airbnb and trade blocking stories — a drive date cancelled by block the same afternoon, a super-like that cost ¥533 followed by an immediate block, a karaoke stand-up — alongside collected anecdotes from friends in Tokyo and New York. Meng offers an honest confession about libido-driven enthusiasm cooling before meetups, framing it as a structural problem with app culture rather than personal failure. The conversation pivots late to STI disclosure norms in Japan, where Meng argues for non-disclosure on cultural-sensitivity grounds and Andrew sits in uneasy half-agreement, a tangent that drew sharper audience reaction than any of the blocking stories.
How this video's like-and-comment rate compares to this channel's running average.
Opening 15 seconds — the bit that decides whether a viewer keeps watching.
“[0:01] Let's remove all these - we don't need these on the table [0:04] You don't want the no smoking sign? [0:06] That would be so funny though, actually [0:08] Hi Tokyo Tops! [0:10] We're at Andrew's Airbnb today [0:12] It's called Maian [0:13] We are in the washitsu downstairs [0:15] The smell of tatami
The opening 15 seconds are entirely consumed by table setup, greetings, and room description — the actual topic (blocking) doesn't arrive until 0:38. Compared to other TokyoBTM conversation episodes, this is unusually slow even by the channel's casual podcast standard, burying the hook in ambient scene-setting.
Three alternative openings, each in a different archetype. Each is under 40 words — completable in 15 seconds.
“Five people in my social circle got blocked in Japan this month — including me. The patterns are wild: ghosted before a confirmed date, blocked mid-conversation, blocked for not texting back in 30 minutes. Here's what we found.”
WhyOpens with a concrete count and specific failure modes, turning a vague shared complaint into a data-driven investigation that signals depth before the conversation even begins.
“If you're dating in Japan and keep getting blocked with zero explanation — you're not alone, and the reason says more about the culture than about you. We need to talk about this.”
WhyDirectly addresses the viewer's lived pain point, the most-liked comment cluster confirms 'this is universal' resonates strongly, so leading with that solidarity lands the hook faster.
“In Japan there's a 'don't ask, don't tell' attitude about STIs — and one of my friends thinks it's fine. I don't. That disagreement is what this conversation is actually about.”
WhyThe STI disclosure debate drove the top three comments (120, 108, 66 likes) and 55% of audience discussion — surfacing that conflict in the hook captures the video's real heat, not its nominal subject.
The title promises a blocking-behavior video, but 55% of comment discussion and all three top comments (combined 294 likes) centre on the mid-video STI disclosure exchange that the title never hints at. Viewers arrived for blocking relateability and found the most inflammatory content was a public-health debate that went unannounced.
Two hosts mid-animated conversation at tatami table, one gesturing expressively — with a large text overlay reading 'BLOCKED' in red, mirroring the comment evidence that the blocking frustration is universally relatable and emotionally charged.
175 comments analysed and clustered into themes.
The tatami-room confessional format — intimate and unguarded enough that Meng said something genuinely controversial on camera. Viewers responded to the rawness: 'I couldn't disagree with you more, my love' and 'I find it IMMORAL that anyone would not do that' are affectionate even in disagreement. The 'grow the fuck up' moment landed as cathartic. Many straight and non-Japanese commenters felt seen: 'I am a straight female, and this happens to me all the time' and 'It's just as bad in Canada.'
How the audience feels — a Net Sentiment mood score, how split the room is, and an early churn signal. All from the comments, not YouTube analytics.
Net Sentiment Score over 125 analysed comments; headline adjusted toward the channel norm (Bayesian, C=20). Polarization = normalised entropy. Comment-derived — not YouTube analytics.
Who actually showed up in the comments — psychographic, topical and language mix. Computed deterministically from 125 labeled root comments.
YouTube’s 2025 discovery shift now weights satisfaction signals — comment sentiment, tone, and depth. We can’t see the model, but we can estimate its inputs. Directional only.
Key transcript moments — tap a timestamp to jump to that point in the video.
Each comment theme mapped to the transcript moment that sparked it.
Meng arguing that an STI-positive person should not tell their past partners and should rely on PrEP/Doxy-PEP instead — framed as a cultural accommodation but received by most commenters as a dangerous public health position.
Meng explicitly linking syphilis rates to the 'gaijin gave it to me' stigma fear as justification for non-disclosure — commenters flipped this logic, arguing the stigma fear IS the mechanism spreading syphilis.
The accumulation of blocking anecdotes (Parris's 15-minute silence, the Shinjuku stand-up, Meng's drive-date block) gave commenters the hook to contribute their own taxonomies — @luckeeleeyeo's 8-reason list got 26 likes.
Andrew's 'it's not only a gay problem, it's a universal problem' line and the explicit 'this is shit-talking blocking, not Japan' framing opened the door for global commenters to validate their own experiences.
Andrew's reflection that repeated blocking makes him anticipate rejection — viewers responded by offering the reframe that poor communicators blocking you is a gift, not a loss.
The Parris story — blocked for not checking his phone for 15 minutes while traveling — became the clearest example commenters cited when calling out entitlement and demanding 'grow the fuck up' maturity.
Severity × frequency — ranked. Each point has an evidence quote and a concrete before/after suggestion.
“meng's mentality is dangerous. this is why the stigma continues. this also puts people's lives in danger.”↗ view
“Saying "its a japan thing" - doesn't really excuse it - and everyone agrees even if its "a japan thing" that doesn't mean its the best way it can be”↗ view
“so, maybe we need a video about stds and stis in japan so we can educate.”↗ view
“I'm so disappointed by this take coming from this channel”↗ view
“3 weeks you can go for a HIV test and not 3 months darling.”↗ view
“Anyways, there's no solutions to this”
“You guys sounds like insecure teenagers :-) Perhaps time for a long term relationship?”↗ view
What a brand or agency would see evaluating this video — which sponsors to pitch, why, what to charge, and what's safe.
This is a deeply loyal, high-touch audience — viewers name themselves as Patreon supporters (@matthewjay660 'I am a loyal subscriber... since before' COVID; @alanbiernacki639 'Congratulations on your 530 patrons! I remember when it was zero') and one even searched Tokyo Pride in person to meet the hosts (@isakucosplay). At 4.4% engagement and 175 comments on 22.6k views, comment-to-view is exceptionally high, signalling parasocial trust a sponsor can borrow. But there is almost no organic purchase-referral behaviour and no 'where do I buy this' demand — they buy the hosts, not products — so ad tolerance is moderate, and this specific episode carries a public-health controversy that makes a sponsor read risky HERE even though the channel is sponsorable in general.
Mid-roll only, placed in the lighter first-half blocking discussion (before the 14:00 STI segment) — never a dedicated read on this episode; the controversy makes a full sponsor segment too risky here.
“Congratulations on your 530 patrons! I remember when it was zero, and then 7.”— Proves a paying, long-tenure support base — direct evidence of monetizable loyalty↗ view
“I am a loyal subscriber and I have enjoyed y'alls' content since before the big bad”— Multi-year retention; a sponsor's message lands on durable trust, not drive-by viewers↗ view
“when i have been in tokyo to pride last year i looked everywhere to see you two and meet you”— Parasocial intensity — viewers act on the relationship offline, the strongest borrowable-trust signal↗ view
Algorithm Signal is a proxy. YouTube’s satisfaction scores aren’t public. Directional, not predictive.
Unanswered questions and explicit requests from the comment thread — fuel for the next upload.
Three video ideas pulled directly from what the comments asked for.
STI disclosure, stigma, and sexual health education for gay men in Japan — covering PrEP, testing windows, anonymous notification, and why 'don't ask don't tell' actively spreads disease
Interview video: 'Why I Block' — invite blockers (anonymously if needed) to explain their reasoning, filmed as a panel or one-on-one confessions
Honest assessment of long-term dating prospects for gay foreigners in Japan — success stories, structural barriers, community-building alternatives to apps
Cultural explainer on confrontation-avoidance in Japan and how it shapes romantic/sexual behavior — blocking as the digital form of silent exit
Dating app design critique — how Grindr vs. other apps handle blocking, read receipts, and rejection UX, and what a healthier design would look like
Concrete, testable changes for the next upload. Each cites a timestamp, a comment quote, or a metric — and names what to watch.
Open future relationship/health episodes by stating the responsible position up front instead of voicing the provocative take unqualified
Add chapters to long talky episodes, marking the blocking discussion and the STI segment separately
Greenlight the dedicated STI/sexual-health-in-Japan video, with a credible source or guest
Reframe titles to lead with the universal hook, not the geo-niche (e.g. 'Why Everyone Blocks Now' over 'in Japan')
Book the off-camera friend whose blocking summary was read aloud (@PokhrajRoy. 'Can we please have him on the channel? PRETTY PLEASE', @DavidinNYC 'Why is all your friends hot?!')
Cut a standalone Short from the 'super like' / accidental-swipe segment
Create a follow-up inviting 'the blockers' to defend themselves, as floated on-camera at 16:42
Address the recurring 'is there hope for a gay gaijin in Japan?' anxiety directly in a future episode
Pin or heart the Japanese-language comments to retain the local-language segment
When discussing medical/health topics, add an on-screen or pinned correction line (e.g. HIV window is ~3-6 weeks, not 3 months)
Build a lightweight sponsor-ready 'evergreen' episode (travel/lifestyle in Tokyo) to host integrations away from controversial topics
Who to reply to first — ranked by impact, with a ready-to-send draft in your voice.
If you find out you have an STI you have a MORAL responsibility to tell all of your previous sex partners to let them know they may need to look for signs or get tested. It's not about trying to find out the "culprit" it's about slowing the spread of a disease. I find it IMMORAL that anyone would not do that. Fortunately in places like San Francisco you can inform you partners anonymously that they may have been infected , maybe this approach works better for those who can't handle dealing the situation without intense shame
You're right, and the anonymous notification system you mentioned is actually something a lot of people don't know exists — that's a real, practical solution. This deserves its own proper video and we're going to make it.
My god, I mean how can you only consider a don't ask don't tell attitude about STDs? This is actively supporting stigma and immaturity in dealing with such infections and will just help to further spread it. Growing up means to take responsibility first for myself and secondary for others I've potentially put at risk of an infection. This who-got-it-from-whom is completely outdated and irrelevant. I mean fucking with someone and then not being able to align a bit if there was an accident is really poor.
I think we were trying to describe a cultural reality we observe here rather than endorse it — but hearing it back I understand exactly why it landed the way it did. A proper follow-up on this is coming.
so, maybe we need a video about stds and stis in japan so we can educate. meng's mentality is dangerous. this is why the stigma continues. this also puts people's lives in danger. the reality is some people won't get tested until prompted and thus, get treatment too late
This is the video we need to make, and we're going to do it properly. If there are specific things you'd want us to cover or questions you want answered, drop them below — genuinely.
Thanks for uploading this - the comments about "just don't tell them" made me very uncomfortable - and I agree it is a very important topic that deserves its own video.
Thank you for taking the time to write all of this — seriously. The HIV/syphilis timeline breakdown is exactly the kind of thing most people genuinely don't know, and it's why this can't just be a footnote. We're making that video.
Andrew and Meng, in June 2025, I turned off my "Read" receipts on my phone. It's a permanent choice. 🇺🇸🤝🇨🇦🇨🇳 P.S. Meng, my darling bao-boy , I am a loyal subscriber and I have enjoyed y'alls' content since before the big bad👉🏻😷☣️🦠, but, my love, I could not disagree with you more about not telling a partner that you have an STI.
Bao-boy 😭 I love you for this. And yes — you're not wrong, and I appreciate that you said it because you've been here long enough to know I can take it. The read receipts off thing is genuinely freeing, by the way.
A few reasons why the gays block: Instant Gratification - If it is not hot and ready in less than 30 minutes, they have no patience. Timing - One is ready now, while the other is just browsing. The ready one takes the slow response time as a sign of disinterest. Mismatch - They were attracted at first but changed their mind upon closer inspection (because of appearance, likes, expectations, etc.). Something (or someone) Different - Someone else came along and grabbed their attention. Communication Skills - They don't know how to use their words or process their emotions, so they avoid accountability. The Call is Coming From Inside the House - A switch flips and they start spamming and sending insane, intense messages. Digital Dating Culture - There are a limited number of squares on the grid. People wanna free up the real estate to see more possibilities. Insecurities - People chat you up and get scared that you are out of their league. Sometimes it has nothing to do with you.
"The Call is Coming From Inside the House" sent me 💀 This breakdown should honestly be in the video description. You nailed every single category.
I am a straight female, and this happens to me all the time. Even after speaking for ages to them. I do not get it, if not interested just say so. I am not crying in my pillow if you do not fancy me , just be honest. I think it is so rude, and unnecessary. Especially when they pretend to be so interested then disappear.
This is exactly the point — it's not a gay thing, not a Japan thing, it's just a people thing. And the 'pretend to be super interested then vanish' version of it is the worst.
I'm Japanese, but some people write "Japanese Only" in their profile, while others don't write it but are hesitant about the person from other countries. You need to look for opportunities to meet the other people, but many Japanese people are shy and introverted. You are well-known in the Japanese gay community, so people may keep a distance from you. If you lower the bar, such as age, body type, and appearance, the number of blocked might be decreasing.
Genuinely appreciate this, especially the 'well-known in the community' point — that's an angle I hadn't thought about that way, and it actually explains a few things. Thank you for being honest with us.
I once was at a club in New York and the man said "I would have sex with you, but I would NEVER be seen walking down the street with you" and that said everything I needed to know about the people I was dealing with.
That is both completely brutal and completely revealing all at once. I hope you walked away from that feeling like you were the one who dodged something — because you were.
Jesus, Mary and all the saints -- what happened to courage, truthfulness, and a bit of grace when ending connections? A simple, honest: 'We're very different people, with different aspirations. I don't see how this can work between us.' That used to be enough. All this blocking feels so emotionally lazy -- or worse, toxic.
"Emotionally lazy" is actually the exact term for it. We kept framing it as anxiety but you're right — at some point avoidance is just avoidance dressed up as self-protection.
I block when people lead with NSFW photos and zero greeting despite being told NOT to do such a thing in my bio. If one cant take the 15 seconds to read the bio, then I am in no way going to make a connection if ones attention span or comprehension is that poor.
We did ask the blockers to stand up for themselves and you just did it perfectly. Reading the bio is genuinely the bare minimum and no one should feel bad for enforcing that.
I'm not using Grindr anymore, I'm Asian living in Toronto and get blocked a lot of times because my body looks like a WHITE TWUNK. Once I send my face photo, I get blocked instantly. I do understand these people feel like being deceived, but it's not my fault with Asian face and WHITE TWUNK BODY. The next one will be better 💅🏻💅🏻💅🏻
"WHITE TWUNK BODY" 💅 But honestly — that's entirely on them. The cognitive dissonance of blocking someone for defying a stereotype is wild, and their loss is very much the next person's gain.
Shareable social-proof quotes — ready for thumbnails, community posts, or a sponsor deck.
“Being blocked is a good thing. It's a bad hookup dodged.”
“People like this that block you is a blessing. Toxic people filtering themselves out of your life.”
“Ok, just a PSA for everyone: Meng is very cute, funny and so sweet. So is Andrew and I adore them both ❤”
“If someone blocks for not responding immediately whether it be minutes or an hour that is a giant red flag IMO.”
“Jesus, Mary and all the saints -- what happened to courage, truthfulness, and a bit of grace when ending connections?”
“I am a straight female, and this happens to me all the time. Even after speaking for ages to them. I do not get it, if not interested just say so.”
“Videos like this make me glad to be in a relationship (for the last fourteen years). Getting blocked for not responding quick enough, I would never have dates 😂”
“Unfortunately, this is a universal problem : ( .”
Moments worth cutting into Shorts — each with a title and a ready hook line. Timestamps link to the video.
Verbatim — the 5 most representative comments from the thread.
If you find out you have an STI you have a MORAL responsibility to tell all of your previous sex partners to let them know they may need to look for signs or get tested. It's not about trying to find out the "culprit" it's about slowing the spread of a disease. I find it IMMORAL that anyone would not do that. Fortunately in places like San Francisco you can inform you partners anonymously that they may have been infected , maybe this approach works better for those who can't handle dealing the situation without intense shame
My god, I mean how can you only consider a don't ask don't tell attitude about STDs? This is actively supporting stigma and immaturity in dealing with such infections and will just help to further spread it. Growing up means to take responsibility first for myself and secondary for others I've potentially put at risk of an infection. This who-got-it-from-whom is completely outdated and irrelevant. I mean fucking with someone and then not being able to align a bit if there was an accident is really poor.
so, maybe we need a video about stds and stis in japan so we can educate. meng's mentality is dangerous. this is why the stigma continues. this also puts people's lives in danger. the reality is some people won't get tested until prompted and thus, get treatment too late
Are you serious? How can you say something like that "not to tell". You are out of your mind. We don't play with people's life's because you have a fear not to be blocked. Is unacceptable
Thanks for uploading this - the comments about "just don't tell them" made me very uncomfortable - and I agree it is a very important topic that deserves its own video. Saying "its a japan thing" - doesn't really excuse it - and everyone agrees even if its "a japan thing" that doesn't mean its the best way it can be
Top reply-magnet comments — where the real debate happened. 50 replies across 23 roots · max chain 4 deep · creator replied to 5%
Are you serious? How can you say something like that "not to tell". You are out of your mind. We don't play with people's life's because you have a fear not to be blocked. Is unacceptable
My god, I mean how can you only consider a don't ask don't tell attitude about STDs? This is actively supporting stigma and immaturity in dealing with such infections and will just help to further spread it. Growing up means to take responsibility first for myself and secondar…
I ain't hating on anyone's private business but you both are way too old to be living that life. Time to get it together, settle down, or call it a day.
Great shirt, Meng! People have all sorts of issues of their own that they wouldn't share with strangers; don't take it personally, it's most likely not even about you but about whatever trouble their facing (I mean, look at the world in its bizarro phase). I honestly prefer to…
If you find out you have an STI you have a MORAL responsibility to tell all of your previous sex partners to let them know they may need to look for signs or get tested. It's not about trying to find out the "culprit" it's about slowing the spread of a disease. I find it IMMOR…
Other featured deep dives on this channel.
